2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears

kind of 2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears will lid the newest and most present help all over the world. entry slowly in view of that you simply comprehend skillfully and appropriately. will progress your data skillfully and reliably

Welcome to our pick-by-pick second- and third-round grades of the 2022 NFL Draft.

For these of you who assume we must always wait just a few years earlier than grading the picks, we disagree. NFL groups must make choices below uncertainty. So we must always consider them based mostly on what we all know on the time of the choose. The grades under will replicate not solely the standard of the prospects but additionally the method — in different phrases, whether or not it’s a smart use of sources given the state of the franchise.

Having stated that, be happy to report me to Old Takes Exposed in a pair years when these look silly.

Stats are courtesy of The Beast or Professional Soccer Focus except in any other case famous.

Spherical 2

33. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Logan Corridor, Edge/DL, Houston

Corridor (6-foot-6, 283) may line up at defensive finish on base downs, however his worth will probably come as an inside go rusher. That’s one thing that each staff’s searching for, and it’s laborious to search out. Corridor had 6.5 sacks and 13.5 tackles for loss final season whereas lining up at completely different spots alongside Houston’s entrance. His athleticism ought to pop towards inside offensive linemen within the NFL. Including go rush makes full sense for the Bucs.

Grade: B+

34. Inexperienced Bay Packers: Christian Watson, WR, North Dakota State

The Packers despatched the Vikings the 53rd and 59th picks to maneuver as much as 34. Watson (6-foot-4, 208) has a formidable measurement/pace (ran 4.36) profile. He caught 43 balls for 801 yards and 7 touchdowns final yr and averaged 20.4 yards per reception in his profession. He examined out as the highest athlete amongst this class of extensive receivers.

However there are some strikes towards Watson. He had a number of knee surgical procedures in the course of the 2019 offseason and missed three video games final yr due to a hamstring damage. All of Watson’s video games got here towards FCS competitors. And per PFF, he had a excessive 13.3% drop charge in his profession.

There are apparent instruments to work with, however Watson will likely be a 23-year-old rookie and can probably want a while to become a high quality vertical menace within the NFL. The Packers may need been higher off holding on to the 2 picks and throwing a pair darts at extensive receiver. Watson is much from a certain factor.

Grade: C+

35. Tennessee Titans: Roger McCreary, CB, Auburn

McCreary (5-foot-11, 190) had a formidable school profession with 37 passes defended and 6 interceptions prior to now three seasons (35 video games). He’s sticky in protection and aggressive. However McCreary ran 4.5 and examined out as a below-average athlete. His 28 7/8-inch arms can be among the many shortest for corners within the NFL.

McCreary is a basic case of movie vs. measurables. I feel this can be a cheap choose.

Grade: B

36. New York Jets: Breece Corridor, RB, Iowa State

The Jets gave up a fifth-round choose to maneuver up two spots. Corridor (5-foot-11, 217) is an entire again who did all of it for Iowa State. He carried 718 instances for 3,941 yards (5.5 YPC) and 50 touchdowns in three seasons. Corridor additionally caught 82 balls for 734 yards and 6 touchdowns.

Per The Athletic’s Dane Brugler, he fumbled simply as soon as each 200 touches, and Corridor pressured the best charge of missed tackles within the nation, per Sports activities Data Options (SIS).

Corridor is a superb prospect, however given the state of the Jets’ roster, I’m unsure they wanted to spend this excessive of a choose on a operating again.

Grade: C

37. Houston Texans: Jalen Pitre, S, Baylor

Pitre (5-foot-11, 198) is one other enjoyable security prospect from this yr’s class. He began 32 video games at Baylor and stuffed up the stat sheet final yr — 76 tackles (18 for loss), three sacks, three pressured fumbles, 9 passes defended and two interceptions. Pitre dedicated zero penalties in 431 protection snaps. Per SIS, he lined up within the slot or within the field on 96% of his snaps.

Pitre is a hybrid defensive again who performs with a feisty persona. I like this transfer for Houston.

Grade: B+

38. Atlanta Falcons: Arnold Ebiketie, Edge, Penn State

The Falcons gave up a fourth-round choose to maneuver up 5 spots. Ebiketie (6-foot-2, 250) transferred from Temple to Penn State final yr and produced 9.5 sacks and 17 tackles for loss in 12 begins. He has 34 1/8-inch arms and examined as a top-five athlete amongst edge defenders on this draft class.

Ebiketie ranked within the prime 10 in each fast strain charge (how typically a participant produces strain in 2.5 seconds or much less) and true strain charge (how typically a participant produces strain on straight dropbacks), per SIS. He tasks as somebody who may start his profession as a rotational go rusher earlier than ultimately changing into a starter. The Falcons desperately want go rush. I don’t thoughts them getting somewhat aggressive right here.

Grade: B

39. Chicago Bears: Kyler Gordon, CB, Washington

Gordon (6 toes, 194) began 17 video games for Washington and completed his profession with 14 passes defended and two interceptions. He performed each on the skin and within the slot. Gordon ranked tied for fifth in yards per protection snap allowed, per SIS. However he performed simply 69 snaps of true man protection, per PFF. Gordon appeared explosive on the sector, however he ran simply 4.52 and examined out as a mediocre athlete for a nook.

It’s honest to marvel when/how the Bears plan on placing supporting items round Justin Fields. However they simply want good gamers at premium positions. This can be a effective use of sources.

Grade: B


Kyler Gordon (Jeff Halstead / Icon Sportswire by way of Getty Pictures)

40. Seattle Seahawks: Boye Mafe, Edge, Minnesota

Mafe (6-foot-4, 261) got here on robust final yr with seven sacks and 10 tackles for loss. He began simply 13 video games in school, however there’s some purpose to consider that Mafe is an ascending participant. He examined out as a top-five athlete amongst edge defenders on this yr’s class. The Seahawks want high quality starters at premium positions. Drafting Mafe makes excellent sense.

Grade: B

41. Seattle Seahawks: Kenneth Walker III, RB, Michigan State

Walker (5-foot-9, 211) was Brugler’s top-ranked operating again. He carried 480 instances for two,794 yards (5.8 YPC) and 35 touchdowns in 32 video games (12 begins). Walker’s 46 runs of 10+ yards had been second within the nation final yr. Per SIS, he completed second in yards after contact per try (3.8), and had only one fumble in 2021.

Let’s be clear: Walker is a effective prospect and a enjoyable participant. However the Seahawks proceed to indicate full disregard for positional worth. They’re paying Rashaad Penny $5.75 million and have huge holes up and down the roster at premium positions (together with quarterback!). It’s unattainable to consider that spending a excessive second-round choose on one other operating again is an optimum use of their sources.

Grade: D

42. Minnesota Vikings: Andrew Sales space, CB, Clemson

The Vikings moved up 11 spots and swapped picks with the Colts. Moreover, they gave up picks 77 (third spherical) and 192 (sixth spherical). Minnesota additionally received 122 (fourth spherical) again in return.

Sales space (6 toes, 194) began 15 video games at Clemson and carried out effectively (14 passes defended, 5 interceptions). He was known as for only one penalty in 35 school video games. Sales space is a bodily, aggressive nook who ought to be capable of play in any scheme.

The query is sturdiness. He didn’t take part in pre-draft athletic testing due to a strained quad and double hernia surgical procedure. And per Brugler, he missed time with a hamstring damage and a stinger final yr. Sales space beforehand had surgical procedure to restore a tear in his patella tendon and had knee tendonitis in highschool.

If Sales space can keep wholesome, this may very well be a home-run choose. However that’s clearly an enormous if. I don’t thoughts taking a swing on his upside right here.

Grade: B

43. New York Giants: Wan’Dale Robinson, WR, Kentucky

Robinson (5-foot-8, 178) started his profession at Nebraska earlier than transferring to Kentucky. He was terrific final yr, catching 104 balls for 1,334 yards and 7 touchdowns. Robinson ran a 4.44. He’s powerful, slippery and explosive.

Having stated that, Brugler had Robinson as his one hundred and fifth general participant. Taking him this excessive looks like a attain. My head is telling me to present the Giants a foul grade, however Robinson is simply such an thrilling participant and has a lot juice. I can’t crush them for falling in love right here.

Grade: B-

44. Houston Texans: John Metchie III, WR, Alabama

The Texans moved up 24 spots right here, giving up picks 68 (third spherical), 108 (fourth spherical) and 124 (fourth spherical) in return.

Metchie (5-foot-11, 187) was extremely productive final yr — 96 catches for 1,142 yards and eight touchdowns — earlier than struggling a torn ACL in December. He doesn’t have eye-popping measurables and possibly received’t contribute immediately, given the damage, however Metchie is a superb route-runner who performs with toughness and vitality. He ought to be capable of line up outdoors or within the slot.

Metchie is a effective prospect, however I’m unsure he has the ceiling to warrant an aggressive transfer up by the Texans, particularly contemplating all of the holes on their roster.

Grade: C


John Metchie III (Mickey Welsh / The Montgomery Advertiser by way of USA TODAY Sports activities)

45. Baltimore Ravens: David Ojabo, Edge, Michigan

Ojabo (6-foot-4, 250) was on observe to be a first-round choose, however he tore his Achilles throughout Michigan’s professional day. He got here on robust final yr with 11 sacks, 12 tackles for loss and 5 pressured fumbles in 14 video games. He had the best sack charge (3.8%) of any edge rusher on this yr’s class.

However Ojabo had performed simply 26 defensive snaps previous to final season, and now he faces a troublesome restoration from a severe damage. The Ravens are the precise staff to take this gamble. They’ve an info edge, provided that Ojabo’s defensive coordinator from Michigan, Mike Macdonald, is now in Baltimore. And since the Ravens draft for quantity, they will afford to take some of these swings on upside.

Grade: A-

46. Detroit Lions: Josh Paschal, Edge, Kentucky

Paschal (6-foot-3, 268) has a tremendous story. Per Brugler, Paschal handled a lethal type of pores and skin most cancers in 2018 and had a tumor eliminated. He got here again to start out 35 video games the subsequent three seasons and was a three-time captain. Pascal had 5.5 sacks and 15.5 tackles for loss in 2021. He has a excessive motor and will have the flexibility to line up on the sting or as an inside go rusher.

This feels somewhat excessive, provided that Brugler had Paschal as his 83rd-ranked prospect. However I don’t have a difficulty with the Lions attempting so as to add extra go rush.

Grade: B-

47. Washington Commanders: Phidarian Mathis, DT, Alabama

Mathis (6-foot-4, 310, 34 5/8-inch arms) began 20 video games for Alabama. He had 9 sacks and 12 tackles for loss final yr. Mathis lined up in a number of spots and ought to be scheme-versatile. He tasks as a disruptive participant towards the run and will have some pass-rush upside.

The knocks on Mathis are that he’s already 24 years previous, and he’s among the many worst athletes at defensive deal with on this yr’s class. I don’t love that mixture.

Grade: C

48. Chicago Bears: Jaquan Brisker, S, Penn State

Brisker (6-foot-1, 206) made 21 begins for the Nittany Lions and had 19 passes defended and 5 interceptions in three seasons. He’s a wise, bodily participant who has the talent set to play a number of roles: within the field, again deep and throughout the slot. Per Brugler, Brisker didn’t commit a single penalty during the last two years. He examined out as a mean athlete amongst safeties however confirmed he can run (4.49). Brisker’s instincts and physicality give him upside as a high quality starter.

Once more, sooner or later, the Bears must acknowledge that their offense wants gamers. However I actually like Brisker for them.

Grade: B+

49. New Orleans Saints: Alontae Taylor, CB, Tennessee

Taylor (6 toes, 199) transitioned from offense to protection throughout his freshman yr and ended up beginning 31 video games. He had 19 passes defended and 4 interceptions. Taylor ran 4.36 and examined out as a plus athlete.

Taylor has instruments to work with and is new to the place. However he’ll flip 24 in December, and Brugler had him ranked as his 124th general participant. Taylor may flip into a terrific participant, however this looks like a little bit of a attain.

Grade: C

50. New England Patriots: Tyquan Thornton, WR, Baylor

Thornton (6-foot-2, 181 with 33 1/4-inch arms) has a uncommon mix of measurement and pace. He ran a 4.28 40 on the mix and caught 62 balls for 948 yards and 10 touchdowns final season.

The Patriots desperately wanted juice/pace on offense, and Thornton offers them that. The query is whether or not he can persistently beat press protection and develop into a extra well-rounded participant. New England is thought for having a shrunken draft board. Brugler had Thornton as his 176th prospect and thought he’d be a fifth-round choose. Possibly Thornton will work out, however this choose looks like a attain.

Grade: C-

51. Philadelphia Eagles: Cam Jurgens, OC, Nebraska

Jurgens (6-foot-3, 303) started his school profession at tight finish earlier than transitioning to heart, the place he began 31 video games the previous three seasons. Jurgens examined athletically as the highest inside offensive lineman prospect on this yr’s class. And per SIS, he gave up only one sack in his complete school profession.

Jurgens is a terrific prospect. The query is whether or not this can be a smart use of sources. Jason Kelce was an All-Professional final yr and is again in 2022. Which means Jurgens received’t see the sector except Kelce suffers an damage. And it’s not just like the Eagles lacked a long-term plan at heart. They only used a second-round choose on Landon Dickerson final yr.

This choose can be extra justifiable if Jurgens had guard/heart versatility. And perhaps the Eagles consider that would be the case. However he solely performed heart in school. I actually just like the participant however don’t love using sources right here.

Grade: C+

52. Pittsburgh Steelers: George Pickens, WR, Georgia

There’s no denying that Pickens (6-foot-3, 195) has superstar-level traits. He’s a bodily specimen who’s able to overpowering and/or out-running NFL corners. He caught 90 balls for 1,347 yards and 14 touchdowns in 26 school video games. Pickens performed simply 63 snaps final yr after getting back from a torn ACL he suffered throughout spring practices.

Nevertheless, as coaches described to The Athletic’s Bruce Feldman, there are some “crimson flags” with Pickens.

However he lands in a great place right here with a terrific head coach in Mike Tomlin. The Steelers have drafted extensive receivers higher than any staff within the league. At 52, this looks like a wise gamble. There may not be a much bigger boom-or-bust participant within the draft.

Grade: A-

53. Indianapolis Colts: Alec Pierce, WR, Cincinnati

Pierce (6-foot-3, 211) caught 52 balls for 884 yards final season. He ran a 4.41 and averaged 17.5 YPR throughout his profession at Cincinnati. Pierce can play on the skin or as an enormous slot and is a plus athlete.

The Colts’ offense wanted so as to add extra juice/pace at receiver. Pierce isn’t a completed product, however he has measurement and pace to work with. I feel this can be a effective use of sources.

Grade: B

54. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Skyy Moore, WR, Western Michigan

Moore (5-foot-10, 195) caught 95 balls for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns final season. He ran 4.41 and examined out as a plus athlete. Moore performed outdoors in school however most likely tasks as a slot receiver within the NFL. He has good arms, could make performs after the catch and confirmed a very good understanding in school of tips on how to beat press protection.

The Chiefs wanted pass-catching assist, and Moore looks like a wonderful match. The very best model of Moore within the NFL would resemble Golden Tate.

Grade: A-

55. Arizona Cardinals: Trey McBride, TE, Colorado State

McBride (6-foot-4, 246) caught 90 balls for 1,121 yards final yr. He ran 4.56 and examined as a plus athlete. Brugler known as him a aggressive blocker who tasks as a greater model of Hayden Hurst.

The Cardinals’ plan appears to be to load up on pass-catching weapons, however they simply signed Zach Ertz to a three-year deal in free company.

They’ve choices to play every kind of various personnel groupings, however I’m unsure this was the very best use of sources, given the opposite wants on the roster.

Grade: B-


Trey McBride (Kyle Okita / Cal Sport Media by way of AP Pictures)

56. Dallas Cowboys: Sam Williams, Edge, Ole Miss

Williams (6-foot-4, 261) had 12.5 sacks and 16 tackles for loss final yr. He’s a top-three athlete amongst edge defenders on this class.

However there are severe issues with Williams. He was suspended from the Ole Miss program in July 2020 following an arrest on felony sexual battery. The fees had been later dropped.

As soon as once more, the Cowboys take a bet on a participant with severe off-field issues.

Grade: C

57. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Luke Goedeke, G/T, Central Michigan

Goedeke (6-foot-5, 312) started his profession at tight finish earlier than transferring to proper deal with, the place he made 24 begins. He most likely tasks as a guard within the NFL.

Goedeke didn’t take part in pre-draft athletic testing due to a hamstring damage. He’s nonetheless comparatively new to offensive line however has potential. Including O-line insurance coverage, particularly if the Bucs consider Goedeke has versatility, is smart for Tampa.

Grade: B

58. Atlanta Falcons: Troy Andersen, LB, Montana State

Andersen (6-foot-4, 243) started his profession as a two-way participant earlier than transitioning full-time to protection the place he made 25 begins at linebacker. He examined as essentially the most athletic off-ball linebacker on this yr’s draft class and was a two-time captain.

In 15 begins final yr, Andersen had 147 tackles (14 for loss), two sacks, 9 passes defended and two interceptions. He wants extra expertise, however given the instruments, Andersen has some upside. This can be a cheap use of sources by Atlanta.

Grade: B

59. Minnesota Vikings: Ed Ingram, OG, LSU

Ingram (6-foot-3, 307) began 35 video games for the Tigers — 23 at left guard, 12 at proper guard. In response to PFF, he allowed two sacks and one QB hit on 484 pass-blocking snaps final yr. Ingram examined out as a plus athlete.

However there are off-field issues. Ingram was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault involving a minor in 2018. The fees had been dismissed a yr later, and he was reinstated to the soccer staff.

Ingram was ranked No. 114 on Brugler’s large board.

Grade: C

60. Cincinnati Bengals: Cam Taylor-Britt, CB, Nebraska

Taylor-Britt (5-foot-11, 196) began 29 video games — seven at security and 22 at cornerback. Previously three seasons, he had six interceptions and 24 passes defended. Taylor-Britt ran 4.38 and examined out as a plus athlete.

I really like what the Bengals have executed with their first two picks. They’ve added two athletic, versatile defensive backs. That’s a very good technique, given the quarterbacks they’ll be going up towards within the AFC.

Grade: B+

61. San Francisco 49ers: Drake Jackson, Edge, USC

Jackson (6-foot-3, 273, 34-inch arms) is an intriguing prospect, and he’ll be enjoying his rookie yr at simply 21 years previous. Jackson had 5 sacks and eight tackles for loss final season. He ranked fifth amongst edge defenders in true strain charge, per SIS.

Jackson is younger, athletic, and the superior stats counsel he was persistently affecting the quarterback when given alternatives final yr. The 49ers get a prospect with upside who performs a premium place. That is considered one of my favourite second-round picks.

Grade: A

62. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Bryan Prepare dinner, S, Cincinnati

Prepare dinner (6-foot-1, 206) started his school profession enjoying cornerback at Howard earlier than transferring to Cincinnati and changing to security. He began 14 video games final yr and had 96 tackles (5 for loss), 11 passes defended and two interceptions.

Per PFF, Prepare dinner logged greater than 150 snaps enjoying deep, within the field and throughout the slot. He graded out as a wonderful tackler. This can be a good addition for Kansas Metropolis.

Grade: B

63. Buffalo Payments: James Prepare dinner, RB, Georgia

Prepare dinner (5-foot-11, 199) carried 230 instances for 1,503 yards (6.5 YPC) and 14 touchdowns throughout his school profession. He additionally caught 67 balls for 730 yards. Per PFF, Prepare dinner had zero drops and 0 fumbles final season.

Prepare dinner ran 4.42 and is a home-run hitter who can produce explosive performs as a runner or as a pass-catcher. This can be a enjoyable addition for an already explosive Payments offense.

Grade: B

64. Denver Broncos: Nik Bonitto, Edge, Oklahoma

Bonitto (6-foot-3, 248) had 18.5 sacks, 32 tackles for loss and 9 passes defended in 36 video games the previous three seasons.He had the best strain charge (22%), the best fast strain charge (12%) and the second-highest true strain charge (23%) amongst edge defenders on this yr’s class.

Bonitto ran a 4.54, and his three-cone time ranked within the 76th percentile. I see a flexible edge rusher who can get after the passer and spy cell quarterbacks. He was considered one of my favourite Day 2 prospects. I really like this choose for the Broncos.

Grade: A

Spherical 3

65. Jacksonville Jaguars: Luke Fortner, OC, Kentucky

Fortner (6-foot-4, 307) began 36 video games — 20 at proper guard, 13 at heart, three at left guard — throughout his school profession. Per PFF, he gave up simply two sacks and one QB hit on 429 pass-blocking snaps final season.

He has a pair issues working towards him. One, Fortner examined out as a below-average athlete. And two, he’ll be a 24-year-old rookie. Having stated that, at this level within the draft, it’s effective to make use of picks on versatile offensive linemen.

Grade: B

66. Minnesota Vikings: Brian Asamoah, LB, Oklahoma

Asamoah (6 toes, 226) began 19 video games for the Sooners. Final yr, he had 89 tackles however didn’t produce a single go breakup or interception.

He’s an undersized run-and-chase linebacker, and Asamoah examined out as a plus athlete.

Grade: B

67. New York Giants: Joshua Ezeudu, G/T, North Carolina

Ezeudu (6-foot-4, 308 with 34-inch arms) began 28 video games — 20 at left guard, six at left deal with, two at proper deal with. He examined out as a plus athlete.

Brugler had Ezeudu ranked as his one hundred and first prospect, however given his measurement, athleticism and flexibility, I’ve no subject with the Giants taking Ezeudu right here.

Grade: B

68. Cleveland Browns: Martin Emerson, CB, Mississippi State

In 36 video games (28 begins), Emerson (6-foot-2, 201 with 33 1/2-inch arms) had 16 passes defended and one interception. He ran 4.53 and examined out as a below-average athlete amongst corners.

Brugler had Emerson as his 167th-ranked prospect. However the Browns clearly felt like he may match their scheme effectively.

Grade: B-

69. Tennessee Titans: Nicholas Petit-Frere, OT, Ohio State

Petit-Frere (6-foot-5, 316) was a big-time recruit. He began 19 video games — 12 at left deal with, seven at proper deal with — for the Buckeyes. Per PFF, he gave up solely two sacks throughout his school profession.

Petit-Frere has the look of an NFL offensive deal with however didn’t fairly put all of it collectively in school. Given the upside of hitting on a beginning deal with, I’ve no subject with the Titans taking a swing right here.

Grade: B


Nicholas Petit-Frere (Gregory Shamus / Getty Pictures)

70. Jacksonville Jaguars: Chad Muma, LB, Wyoming

On one hand, there’s quite a bit to love about Muma (6-foot-3, 239). He was a two-time captain who piled up 142 tackles final yr to associate with three passes defended and three interceptions. Brugler praised his competitiveness and soccer IQ.

Then again, what number of linebackers are the Jaguars planning on enjoying at one time? They signed Foyesade Oluokun in free company and traded again into the primary spherical for Devin Lloyd. Now they use this choose on Muma.

I attempt to grade every choose individually, and taking Muma at this spot is completely cheap. I’m simply not fairly certain what the Jaguars’ plan is.

Grade: B

71. Chicago Bears: Velus Jones Jr., WR, Tennessee

Jones (6 toes, 204) had 62 catches for 807 yards and 7 touchdowns final season. He spent six years in school — 4 at USC and two extra at Tennessee.

Previous to final season, Jones had by no means had greater than 280 receiving yards in a season.

Jones has wonderful pace (ran 4.31), however this can be a head-scratching choose by the Bears. Jones ranked 182nd on Brugler’s large board. For a staff with restricted sources, why spend a Day 2 choose on a soon-to-be 25-year-old rookie slot receiver with one yr of manufacturing? Possibly Jones will likely be nice, however I don’t get this choose.

Grade: D

72. Seattle Seahawks: Abraham Lucas, OT, Washington State

Lucas (6-foot-6, 315) began 42 video games at proper deal with. He didn’t enable a sack on 477 pass-blocking snaps final season, per PFF. Lucas examined athletically as a top-three offensive deal with on this yr’s class.

Lucas is unproven as a run blocker, and groups may view him with no consideration tackle-only choice. However he has measurement and athleticism to work with. This can be a effective use of sources by Seattle.

Grade: B

73. Indianapolis Colts: Jelani Woods, TE, Virginia

Woods (6-foot-7, 253) started his school profession as a quarterback at Oklahoma State earlier than making the swap to tight finish. He had 44 catches for 598 yards and eight touchdowns final season at Virginia.

Woods ran 4.61 and examined as the highest athlete amongst tight ends on this yr’s class. He held up effectively as a blocker and has drawn comps to Marcedes Lewis.

Woods ought to be a helpful participant for the Colts, and his athletic testing suggests some upside as a pass-catcher.

Grade: B

74. Atlanta Falcons: Desmond Ridder, QB, Cincinnati

For groups with out a quarterback, it’s all about taking swings.

The Athletic’s Nate Tice had Ridder (6-foot-3, 211) as his QB1 on this yr’s class. Ridder accomplished 64.9% of his passes final yr whereas throwing 30 touchdowns and eight interceptions. He ran 4.52 on the mix and ran for 557 yards final yr (excluding sacks).

The query is whether or not Ridder can show the mandatory repetitive accuracy to achieve success. Tice has in contrast the very best model of Ridder to a mixture of Ryan Tannehill and Dak Prescott.

Ridder may by no means flip into even a mean starter. However a flier within the third spherical for a staff like Atlanta? That makes excellent sense.

Grade: B+

75. Houston Texans: Christian Harris, LB, Alabama

Harris (6-foot-1, 226) is undersized, however he began 40 video games in three seasons for Nick Saban, which appears laborious to do except you could have excellent intangibles. Final yr, Harris had 79 tackes (12.5 for loss), 5.5 sacks and two pressured fumbles. He ran 4.44 and examined out as a top-five athlete amongst linebackers on this yr’s class.

Harris can blitz, spy cell QBs and canopy. Brugler had Harris as his Forty sixth-ranked prospect. I actually like this choose.

Grade: A-

76. Baltimore Ravens: Travis Jones, DT, UConn

Jones (6-foot-4, 325) may find yourself being the Day 2 model of Georgia’s Jordan Davis. He had 47 tackles, 4.5 sacks and seven.5 tackles for loss in 11 begins final yr. SIS tracks true strain charge (how typically a participant produces strain on straight dropbacks) and fast strain charge (how typically a participant produces strain in 2.5 seconds or much less). Jones ranked first and third, respectively, in these two classes final yr.

By way of athletic testing, solely Davis was higher amongst defensive tackles. I like this choose quite a bit for the Ravens.

Grade: A-

77. Indianapolis Colts: Bernhard Raimann, OT, Central Michigan

Raimann (6-foot-6, 303) started his school profession as a decent finish and has solely 18 begins of expertise at left deal with. Having stated that, he gave up only one sack on greater than 700 pass-blocking snaps, per PFF.

Given his relative inexperience and the truth that he’ll be a 25-year-old rookie, I’m unsure I’d have taken Raimann right here. However he performs a premium place, fills a necessity and has upside.

Grade: B

78. Cleveland Browns: Alex Wright, Edge, UAB

Wright (6-foot-5, 271) began 18 video games in three seasons. He had seven sacks and seven.5 tackles for loss final season. His pre-draft testing was restricted after he suffered a strained pectoral muscle benching on the mix.

Wright is a protracted, toolsy edge rusher with upside. This can be a effective use of sources by the Browns.

Grade: B

79. Los Angeles Chargers: JT Woods, S, Baylor

Woods (6-foot-2, 195) began 28 video games at Baylor. He had eight passes defended and 6 interceptions final season.

Woods ran 4.36 and is a plus athlete. He wants to enhance as a tackler however has pace, vary and ball expertise. I’ve no drawback taking a flier on a prospect with these traits at this level within the draft.

Grade: B

80. Denver Broncos: Greg Dulcich, TE, UCLA

Dulcich (6-foot-4, 243) is a pass-catching tight finish who’s able to producing explosive performs. He caught 42 balls for 725 yards final season and averaged 17.6 YPR throughout his school profession. Dulcich has some shiftiness to his route-running, however his athletic testing (ran 4.69) was considerably disappointing.

The Broncos included Noah Fant within the deal for Russell Wilson. Dulcich has the potential to be a field-stretching tight finish. I like this transfer for Denver.

Grade: B+

81. New York Giants: Cor’Dale Flott, CB, LSU

Flott (6-foot-1, 175) began 21 video games for LSU. In 11 video games final yr, he had 12 passes defended, two pressured fumbles and one interception.

Flott has expertise enjoying each outdoors and within the slot, and he performs with a feisty demeanor. General, the measurables (he ran 4.5) are common to under common. The identical will be stated about his ball manufacturing.

Brugler had Flott ranked 169 on his large board, however the Giants clearly see a starting-caliber participant.

Grade: B-

82. Atlanta Falcons: DeAngelo Malone, Edge, Western Kentucky

Malone (6-foot-3, 243) spent a very long time in school. He had 34 sacks in 62 video games (53 begins). He additionally had 60 tackles for loss, 9 pressured fumbles and eight passes defended.

Malone’s weak spot is towards the run, however he has upside as a go rusher. And that’s what the Falcons want. I just like the match, and I just like the choose.

Grade: B+

83. Philadelphia Eagles: Nakobe Dean, LB, Georgia

Dean (5-foot-11, 229) was the captain of the very best protection within the nation final yr. He had 72 tackles (10.5 for loss), six sacks, two pressured fumbles, eight passes defended and two interceptions.

Dean is undersized. He didn’t take part in any pre-draft athletic testing. And stories surfaced prior to now 24 hours that he was coping with a pectoral damage.

It’s all the time dangerous to label a choose like this a steal, given what number of groups handed on Dean. However nonetheless, he was Brugler’s Twenty ninth-ranked participant. And Dean’s finest traits are his tackling, his management and his soccer IQ. He goes to an Eagles staff in determined want of linebacker assist.

We’ll get extra info on why Dean slipped to date, however at No. 83, it’s laborious to not like this choose.

Grade: A-

84. Pittsburgh Steelers: DeMarvin Leal, DT, Texas A&M

Leal (6-foot-4, 283) had 8.5 sacks and 12.5 tackles for loss final yr. He was a big-time recruit who flashed upside however by no means fairly put all of it collectively.

I just like the slot in Pittsburgh, the place he’ll be a part of a bunch of achieved veterans. Given his upside as a disruptive inside lineman, Leal coming off the board right here makes loads of sense.

Grade: A-


DeMarvin Leal (Jerome Miron / USA As we speak)

 

85. New England Patriots: Marcus Jones, CB, Houston

Jones (5-foot-8, 174) began 27 video games in school. In 13 video games final yr, he had 18 passes defended and 5 interceptions.

Jones is undersized, however he’s a aggressive nook who has ball expertise and might cowl. And Jones was a prolific returner at Houston. His talent set ought to match effectively in Invoice Belichick’s protection and on New England’s particular groups. I like this choose.

Grade: B+

86. Tennessee Titans: Malik Willis, QB, Liberty

Quarterback choices within the present NFL panorama come right down to upside. And the very best model of Willis (6-foot-1, 219) is best than the very best model of the opposite quarterbacks on this class.

Willis accomplished 62.8% of his passes in school with 48 touchdowns and 18 interceptions. He ran for 1,227 yards (if we exclude sacks) final yr and averaged 8.4 YPC. Willis is a toolsy prospect and a dynamic athlete with a powerful arm.

Willis is much from a completed product, and there will likely be rising pains. He took 51 sacks in 13 begins final yr. The truth that he lasted this lengthy is telling.

However the Titans will be affected person. They’ve Ryan Tannehill for 2022 however should not tied to him past that. It’d by no means work out with Willis, however this looks like a worthy swing to take.

Grade: A-

87. Arizona Cardinals: Cameron Thomas, Edge/DL, San Diego State

Thomas (6-foot-4, 267) began 34 video games and was extremely productive final yr with 11.5 sacks and 20.5 tackles for loss. He has the power to line up at defensive finish on base downs and swing inside on apparent passing conditions.

The Cardinals wanted so as to add go rush after having misplaced Chandler Jones in free company. I like this match.

Grade: B+

88. Dallas Cowboys: Jalen Tolbert, WR, South Alabama

Tolbert (6-foot-1, 194) had a prolific school profession, catching 178 balls for 3,140 yards and 22 touchdowns whereas averaging 17.6 YPR. He ran 4.49 and examined out as a mean athlete amongst extensive receivers.

Tolbert’s finest likelihood for fulfillment will likely be to carve out a task as an out of doors receiver who can stretch the sector vertically. At this level within the draft, Tolbert was an affordable choice for Dallas.

Grade: B

89. Buffalo Payments: Terrel Bernard, LB, Baylor

In 45 video games for Baylor, Bernard (6-foot-1, 224) had 317 tackles (31.5 for loss), 16.5 sacks, 12 passes defended and three interceptions.

He was a captain final yr however battled by a lot of accidents in his profession, together with (per Brugler) a fractured shoulder, a torn labrum, a damaged proper hand and a damaged foot.

Bernard is undersized, however he has the potential to develop right into a starter if he can keep wholesome.

Grade: B

90. Las Vegas Raiders: Dylan Parham, G/C, Memphis

Parham (6-foot-3, 311) began 51 video games — 28 at left guard, 12 at proper guard, 11 at proper deal with — prior to now 4 seasons. Per PFF, he didn’t enable a sack on 545 go block snaps final season.

Parham examined effectively athletically and was the 72nd-ranked prospect on Brugler’s board. Given his versatility, this choose makes plenty of sense for the Raiders.

Grade: B+

91. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Rachaad White, RB, Arizona State

White (6 toes, 214) carried 224 instances for 1,426 yards (6.4 YPC) and 20 touchdowns within the final two years. He additionally caught 51 balls for 607 yards.

White is an excellent athlete and ought to be a pleasant complementary again for the Bucs who’s able to making performs within the passing recreation.

Grade: B

92. Inexperienced Bay Packers: Sean Rhyan, OG, UCLA

Rhyan (6-foot-5, 321) began 31 video games at left deal with for the Bruins. He allowed only one sack on 451 pass-blocking snaps final yr, per PFF.

Rhyan didn’t miss a recreation in his profession and improved after beginning as a real freshman in 2019. Brugler tasks him to make the swap to protect within the NFL. This can be a effective use of a third-round choose by the Packers.

Grade: B

93. San Francisco 49ers: Tyrion Davis-Value, RB, LSU

Davis-Value (6 toes, 211) carried 211 instances for 1,003 yards (4.8 YPC) and 6 touchdowns final season. He wasn’t a lot of an element as a pass-catcher (10 catches for 64 yards).

Throughout his three-year profession, Davis-Value averaged simply 4.6 YPC. On condition that he tasks as a two-down again and that the 49ers have restricted draft capital, I don’t love using sources right here.

Grade: C

94. Carolina Panthers: Matt Corral, QB, Ole Miss

Corral (6-foot-2, 212) accomplished 67.9% of his passes with 20 touchdowns and 5 interceptions final season. He additionally ran for 773 yards (excluding sacks).

Corral performs with a aggressive, fiery persona, however that may result in him absorbing pointless contact, which may very well be a serious drawback within the NFL. Determination-making and ball safety may be points. Corral had seven intentional groundings and eight fumbles final yr, per Brugler.

I most popular Malik Willis and Desmond Ridder to Corral, however scouting quarterbacks is difficult. And once you don’t have a man, you have to be taking swings like this. Even when it doesn’t work out, this course of is smart for Carolina.

Grade: B+

95. Cincinnati Bengals: Zachary Carter, DT, Florida

Carter (6-foot-4, 282) had eight sacks and 11 tackles for loss final yr. He began 25 video games in his profession and lined up in a number of spots alongside the defensive position.

Opinions can range on prospects, however Brugler noticed Carter as a considerably restricted participant and had him ranked 220th on his large board. This looks like a little bit of a attain for Cincinnati.

Grade: C+

96. Indianapolis Colts: Nick Cross, S, Maryland

Cross (6 toes, 212) began 21 video games for the Terps. He had 18 passes defended and 6 interceptions in three seasons.

Cross is a younger prospect (turns 21 in September) and examined as the very best athlete amongst safeties on this yr’s class.

He may not contribute immediately, however Cross has the instruments and flexibility to develop right into a starter. I actually just like the swing on upside right here.

Grade: A-

97. Detroit Lions: Kerby Joseph, S, Illinois

Joseph (6-foot-1, 203) began 10 video games at free security final season and had 5 interceptions to associate with seven passes defended.

He selected to not run on the mix after which was coping with a hamstring damage at his professional day.

Joseph tasks as a rangy security with ball expertise. This can be a effective choose at this spot for Detroit.

Grade: B

98. Washington Commanders: Brian Robinson Jr., RB, Alabama

Robinson carried 545 instances for two,704 yards (5.0 YPC) and 29 touchdowns throughout his 5 seasons at Alabama. He additionally caught 52 balls for 446 yards.

Robinson is a bodily, downhill again. He didn’t carry the load till 2021 and figures to be a complementary again in Washington.

Grade: B-


Brian Robinson Jr. (Kevin C. Cox / Getty Pictures)

99. Cleveland Browns: David Bell, WR, Purdue

Bell (6-foot-1, 212) was a prolific receiver final yr, ending with 93 catches for 1,286 yards and 6 touchdowns.

The query with Bell is whether or not he’ll go the athletic thresholds essential to beat NFL corners. He ran 4.65 and and didn’t depend on athleticism or explosiveness at Purdue.

Bell will lean on his smarts, savvy and toughness within the NFL. He may very well be an choice to contribute immediately as a slot receiver.

Grade: B

100. Arizona Cardinals: Myjai Sanders, Edge, Cincinnati

Sanders (6-foot-5, 228) had 13.5 sacks, 24 tackles for loss and 13 passes defended in 48 school video games.

Per Brugler, scouts had questions on Sanders’ weight fluctuation. He weighed 228 on the mix and 247 at his professional day. Sanders was known as for twenty-four penalties within the final three seasons, together with 9 offsides flags final yr alone. He turns 24 in July.Sanders has some apparent elements working towards him, however at this level within the draft, taking a flier on a toolsy go rusher is okay.

Grade: C+

101. New York Jets: Jeremy Ruckert, TE, Ohio State

Ruckert (6-foot-5, 252) began 16 video games for the Buckeyes. He had 26 catches for 309 yards and three touchdowns final season.

Ruckert was not a prolific pass-catcher at any level throughout his school profession, however he possesses the talent set required — each as a blocker and receiver — to develop right into a starter within the NFL.

Grade: B

102. Miami Dolphins: Channing Tindall, LB, Georgia

Tindall (6-foot-2, 230) didn’t begin a recreation in school. However he nonetheless performed 474 snaps final yr and had 67 tackles (7.5 for loss) and 5.5 sacks.

Tindall ran a 4.47 and examined athletically as one of many prime 5 linebackers on this yr’s class.

This can be a effective choose at this level within the draft.

Grade: B+

103. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Leo Chenal, LB, Wisconsin

Chenal (6-foot-3, 250) has a pair issues going for him. One, he was extremely productive final yr with 115 tackles (18.5 for loss), eight sacks and two pressured fumbles. Two, he ran 4.53 and examined out because the second-best athlete amongst this class of linebackers.

Chenal’s movie suggests a downhill thumper. If he can enhance in protection or discover a position as a blitzer in passing conditions, he has an opportunity to develop right into a three-down participant.

Grade: B+

104. Los Angeles Rams: Logan Bruss, OG, Wisconsin

Bruss (6-foot-5, 309) began 35 video games — 26 at proper deal with, six at proper guard and three at tight finish. He didn’t enable a sack in 2021 or 2020, in accordance with PFF.

O-line guru Brandon Thorn compared Bruss to former Rams guard Austin Corbett.

Taking a shot on a flexible offensive lineman who carried out effectively in school and is a satisfactory athlete makes loads of sense right here.

Grade: B

105. San Francisco 49ers: Danny Grey, WR, SMU

Grey (6 toes, 186) had 49 catches for 803 yards and 9 touchdowns in 10 video games final yr. He ran a 4.33 on the mix and is a plus athlete.

Grey had points with drops (seven final season) and missed a number of video games due to accidents in every of the previous two years.

However the 49ers may gain advantage from a specialised extensive receiver who can run and stretch the sector. Grey has the potential to present them that.

Grade: B+

(Illustration: Wes McCabe / The Athletic; picture: Ben Liebenberg by way of Related Press)


I hope the article roughly 2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears provides keenness to you and is helpful for complement to your data